Subject: SSP Message Header Length Field

From: "Steve Klein (254-5623)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 94 15:27:40 EDT

I think Lakshman's suggestion of moving the SSP Message Header Length
field to a common location is a good resolution of the issues raised
with concern to handling DLSw TCP data streams and flexibility for
defining new SSP headers in the future.  How about making the reserved
byte an offset x'F' (the byte that follows the Message Type in the
Information Message) the new header length field?   I believe byte 1
is the intended home of the Flow Control group's pacing flags field.

Steve